Protected

NCP-AIO module content is available after admin verification. Redirecting...

If you are not redirected, login.

Access

Admin only

NCP-AIO module pages are restricted to admin users.

Training / NCP-AIO

Installation and Deployment

Module study guide

Priority 1 of 4 ยท Domain 1 in exam order

Scope

Exam study content

This module contains expanded study notes, scenario playbooks, command runbooks, and exam-style checkpoint questions.

Exam weight
31%
Priority tier
Tier 1
Why this domain
Largest domain; sets the control-plane and runtime baseline for every later operational decision.

Exam Framework

How to reason under pressure

1. Stabilize Before Optimizing

  • Verify hardware and management-plane integrity first.
  • Confirm firmware/software baseline consistency.
  • Only then run performance tuning decisions.

2. Single-Variable Changes

  • Change one parameter at a time when investigating regressions.
  • Use before/after evidence with constant workload input.
  • Discard changes without reproducible benefit.

Exam Scope Coverage

What this module now covers

Domain 1 covers the full installation and deployment chain: prerequisites, stack sequencing, scheduler integration, registry/model setup, and platform runtime services.

Track 1: Deployment sequence and prerequisites

This is the highest-weight domain and depends on strict sequencing from infrastructure readiness to workload runtime.

  • Validate hardware and software prerequisites before platform bootstrap.
  • Use an explicit deployment sequence with gate checks at each layer.
  • Capture baseline artifacts for post-deployment validation.

Drill: Write a deployment runbook with stop conditions for each layer (firmware, OS, scheduler, runtime).

Track 2: Management and monitoring stack installation

Blueprint scope explicitly includes BCM, Mission Control, and UFM integration.

  • Differentiate management stack roles and integration touchpoints.
  • Validate health across management endpoints after installation.
  • Plan rollback for failed management stack updates.

Drill: Document one end-to-end stack validation flow from install to health check.

Track 3: Scheduler and runtime setup

Run:ai, Slurm, and Kubernetes scheduler setup determines workload routing quality.

  • Install and validate scheduler stack in deterministic order.
  • Ensure NVIDIA container runtime/toolkit is configured on worker nodes.
  • Verify GPU visibility from orchestrated workloads.

Drill: Deploy one test workload and verify scheduler placement plus GPU runtime readiness.

Track 4: Registry, model runtime, and inference endpoint

NGC registry/API key, NIM, and TensorRT-LLM setup are explicit objectives and critical for production serving.

  • Validate registry authentication and model artifact access.
  • Install and verify NIM/TensorRT-LLM runtime dependencies.
  • Expose and validate inference endpoints with health checks.

Drill: Configure one model-serving endpoint and prove readiness with a structured test call.

Track 5: DOCA and Magnum IO service integration

Lower-layer runtime services affect network and workload performance characteristics.

  • Install container toolkit and runtime dependencies on worker nodes.
  • Install and validate DOCA services on DPU Arm where required.
  • Confirm Magnum IO stack readiness for target workload path.

Drill: Build a dependency map showing how DOCA/container toolkit/Magnum IO affect workload startup.

Module Resources

Downloads and quick links

Concept Explanations

Deep-dive concept library

Exam Decision Hierarchy

Prioritize decisions in this order: safety and hardware integrity, baseline consistency, controlled validation, then optimization.

  • If integrity checks fail, stop optimization and remediate first.
  • Compare against known-good baseline before changing multiple variables.
  • Document rationale for each decision to support incident replay.

Operational Evidence Standard

Treat every key action as evidence-producing: command, output, timestamp, and expected vs observed behavior.

  • Evidence should be reproducible by another engineer.
  • Use stable command templates for repeated environments.
  • Keep concise but complete validation artifacts for exam-style reasoning.

Deployment as dependency graph

Treat installation as a dependency graph, not a linear script, so failure handling stays predictable.

  • Every node in the graph should have validation criteria.
  • Upstream failures should block downstream execution.
  • Dependency graph should include external services like registry access.

Control-plane versus runtime readiness

Control-plane availability does not guarantee workload runtime correctness.

  • Validate scheduler placement and runtime execution separately.
  • Confirm GPU visibility from workload context, not host only.
  • Capture runtime logs as baseline artifacts.

Endpoint readiness discipline

Model-serving readiness must include artifact access, model load, endpoint health, and response validation.

  • Smoke tests should include at least one real inference payload.
  • Health checks alone are insufficient without response validation.
  • Keep a known-good sample request for regression checks.

Scenario Playbooks

Exam-style scenario explanations

Scenario: Fresh deployment with partial runtime failure

Control plane services are up, but GPU workloads fail on a subset of worker nodes after deployment.

Architecture Diagram

Mgmt Stack (BCM/Mission Control/UFM)
            |
Scheduler Layer (Run:ai/Slurm/K8s)
            |
Worker Nodes + GPU Runtime

Response Flow

  1. Verify stage-gate evidence to identify first failing layer.
  2. Check worker runtime configuration and GPU visibility from workload context.
  3. Validate scheduler placement constraints and node labeling.
  4. Apply targeted fix and rerun validation workload.

Success Signals

  • Failed nodes join healthy workload execution path.
  • No regression on previously healthy nodes.
  • Post-fix evidence is captured for baseline update.

Kubernetes node and GPU check

kubectl get nodes -o wide && kubectl describe node <worker-node>

Expected output (example)

Node is Ready with expected GPU resource advertisement.

Container runtime GPU sanity

docker run --rm --gpus all nvidia/cuda:12.4.1-base-ubuntu22.04 nvidia-smi

Expected output (example)

Container sees expected GPU devices and driver/runtime versions.

Scenario: Endpoint deploy succeeds but inference fails

NIM/TensorRT-LLM service is running, yet inference requests fail intermittently.

Architecture Diagram

NGC Registry/Auth
      |
Model Runtime (NIM/TensorRT-LLM)
      |
Inference Endpoint/API

Response Flow

  1. Validate artifact pull and model loading status.
  2. Check endpoint health and logs for runtime errors.
  3. Run controlled inference payload and compare against expected response.
  4. Fix dependency gap and verify stability over repeated requests.

Success Signals

  • Endpoint returns valid responses across repeated calls.
  • No artifact/authentication errors in runtime logs.
  • Performance remains inside expected baseline envelope.

CLI and Commands

High-yield command runbooks

CLI Execution Pattern

  • 1. Capture baseline state before running any intrusive command.
  • 2. Execute command with explicit scope (node, interface, GPU set).
  • 3. Compare output against expected baseline signature.
  • 4. Record timestamp and decision (pass, investigate, remediate).

Deployment gate verification runbook

Validate each installation stage before promoting to next stage.

BCM shell availability

cmsh -c 'show version'

Expected output (example)

BCM CLI responds with installed version details.

Kubernetes control-plane status

kubectl get nodes -o wide

Expected output (example)

All required nodes are Ready with expected roles.

Container toolkit runtime config

nvidia-ctk runtime configure --runtime=docker

Expected output (example)

Runtime configuration updated successfully with no errors.
  • Run and archive outputs per stage.
  • Stop progression if one stage fails validation.

Registry and endpoint readiness runbook

Validate artifact access and serving path before production onboarding.

NGC CLI auth check

ngc config current

Expected output (example)

Active org/team and API key context are valid.

Endpoint health

curl -sS http://<nim-endpoint>/health

Expected output (example)

Health payload indicates ready state.

Inference smoke test

curl -sS -X POST http://<nim-endpoint>/v1/completions -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"prompt":"hello","max_tokens":8}'

Expected output (example)

Endpoint returns valid completion payload with expected schema.
  • Pair health checks with inference tests.
  • Capture latency and error rate baseline for post-deploy comparison.

Common Problems

Failure patterns and fixes

Scheduler appears healthy but workloads remain Pending

Symptoms

  • Pods/jobs stay Pending despite available nodes.
  • GPU resources are not allocated as expected.

Likely Cause

Node labels, runtime configuration, or resource advertisement mismatch.

Remediation

  • Validate node labels/taints and scheduler constraints.
  • Verify GPU runtime and resource plugin status.
  • Rerun workload after correcting resource path.

Prevention: Include scheduler-plus-runtime validation as mandatory install gate.

Model-serving endpoint unhealthy after deploy

Symptoms

  • Health probe flaps or returns failure.
  • Inference calls fail with model loading errors.

Likely Cause

Registry auth or model artifact dependency incomplete.

Remediation

  • Revalidate NGC auth and artifact access.
  • Inspect runtime logs for model init failure details.
  • Repair dependency and rerun smoke tests.

Prevention: Automate registry and artifact preflight checks before endpoint deployment.

DPU-side services installed but workload path unstable

Symptoms

  • Intermittent networking behavior after DOCA setup.
  • Runtime communication tests fail under load.

Likely Cause

Service dependency mismatch across DPU and worker runtime versions.

Remediation

  • Validate service versions and compatibility matrix.
  • Restart affected services after config correction.
  • Run repeated communication validation under load.

Prevention: Track DPU/worker runtime compatibility as part of release readiness checks.

Lab Walkthroughs

Step-by-step execution guides

Walkthrough: Installation-to-workload validation

Run a full deployment path from control-plane install to successful GPU workload execution.

Prerequisites

  • Provisioned nodes and network access.
  • Admin credentials for management stack and scheduler.
  • Container toolkit and required packages available.
  1. Validate cluster node readiness.

    kubectl get nodes -o wide

    Expected: All required nodes are Ready.

  2. Confirm GPU runtime in container context.

    docker run --rm --gpus all nvidia/cuda:12.4.1-base-ubuntu22.04 nvidia-smi

    Expected: Container reports expected GPU inventory.

  3. Submit validation workload.

    kubectl apply -f gpu-smoke-test.yaml && kubectl logs -f job/gpu-smoke-test

    Expected: Workload completes successfully with no GPU runtime errors.

Success Criteria

  • Control-plane and runtime path are both validated.
  • Evidence is stored for baseline comparison.
  • Deployment can progress to model-serving setup.

Walkthrough: Registry to inference endpoint

Validate NGC access, model runtime startup, and endpoint response quality.

Prerequisites

  • NGC API key configured.
  • NIM/TensorRT-LLM runtime deployed.
  • Endpoint URL and auth route documented.
  1. Validate NGC config context.

    ngc config current

    Expected: Active config shows valid org/team and API setup.

  2. Check endpoint health.

    curl -sS http://<nim-endpoint>/health

    Expected: Health output indicates ready.

  3. Run inference smoke test.

    curl -sS -X POST http://<nim-endpoint>/v1/completions -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"prompt":"test","max_tokens":8}'

    Expected: Endpoint returns valid completion response.

Success Criteria

  • Artifact access and model serving path are stable.
  • Inference output schema is correct.
  • Latency and error baselines are recorded.

Study Sprint

10-day execution plan

Day Focus Output
1 Objective mapping and deployment sequence definition. Domain 1 gated deployment plan.
2 Hardware/software prerequisite validation. Preflight checklist with pass/fail criteria.
3 Management stack installation rehearsal (BCM/Mission Control/UFM). Management stack verification report.
4 Scheduler stack and worker runtime setup. Scheduler and runtime readiness checklist.
5 NGC private registry/API key and artifact access validation. Registry and model access report.
6 NIM and TensorRT-LLM setup with endpoint smoke tests. Inference endpoint baseline report.
7 Container toolkit and DOCA service installation drill. Worker runtime and DPU service validation log.
8 Magnum IO dependency and workload validation. Communication/runtime dependency map.
9 Integrated install-to-validation simulation. End-to-end deployment evidence pack.
10 Final revision and exam-style deployment scenarios. Domain 1 quick execution sheet.

Hands-on Labs

Practical module work

Each lab includes a collapsed execution sample with representative CLI usage and expected output.

Lab A: End-to-end deployment gate rehearsal

Execute full installation sequence with explicit gate evidence.

  • Run prerequisite checks before any package installation.
  • Install stack in documented sequence with verification per stage.
  • Record rollback points and outcome of each gate.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Deployment gate verification runbook)

cmsh -c 'show version'

Expected output (example)

BCM CLI responds with installed version details.

Lab B: Scheduler and GPU runtime validation

Confirm scheduler stack and worker runtime can launch GPU workloads.

  • Validate scheduler control-plane health.
  • Launch test GPU workload and verify placement.
  • Collect runtime logs for post-deployment baseline.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Deployment gate verification runbook)

kubectl get nodes -o wide

Expected output (example)

All required nodes are Ready with expected roles.

Lab C: Registry to model-serving path

Validate private registry access and inference endpoint readiness.

  • Authenticate to NGC and pull required artifact.
  • Deploy NIM/TensorRT-LLM service path.
  • Run health and inference smoke tests.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Deployment gate verification runbook)

nvidia-ctk runtime configure --runtime=docker

Expected output (example)

Runtime configuration updated successfully with no errors.

Lab D: DOCA and Magnum IO integration check

Verify lower-layer service dependencies for workload communication path.

  • Confirm DOCA service state on DPU Arm node.
  • Validate worker container runtime alignment.
  • Run representative communication test and record outcome.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Registry and endpoint readiness runbook)

ngc config current

Expected output (example)

Active org/team and API key context are valid.

Exam Pitfalls

Common failure patterns

  • Installing components out of sequence and masking root causes.
  • Skipping prerequisite verification and troubleshooting after failure.
  • Declaring scheduler readiness before GPU runtime validation.
  • Testing model-serving endpoint without validating registry/auth dependencies.
  • Treating DOCA/Magnum IO as optional in workloads that depend on them.
  • Operating without rollback snapshots for each installation stage.

Practice Set

Domain checkpoint questions

Attempt each question first, then open the answer and explanation.

Q1. What is the strongest reason to enforce deployment gates?
  • A. To slow deployment
  • B. To isolate failures and preserve deterministic recovery
  • C. To avoid monitoring
  • D. To reduce documentation

Answer: B

Stage gates prevent cascading failures and make root cause localization much faster.

Q2. Why validate scheduler and runtime together?
  • A. They are independent
  • B. Successful scheduling without GPU runtime correctness is operationally incomplete
  • C. Runtime only matters in dev
  • D. Scheduler checks are optional

Answer: B

Production readiness requires both control-plane placement and data-plane execution correctness.

Q3. Which dependency chain is most critical for serving readiness?
  • A. UI theme -> dashboard
  • B. Registry auth -> artifact access -> runtime init -> endpoint health
  • C. User profile -> shell alias
  • D. Kernel wallpaper

Answer: B

Serving endpoints fail when any upstream dependency in that chain is broken.

Q4. Why are DOCA service checks included in installation domain?
  • A. They are unrelated
  • B. Blueprint scope includes DOCA on DPU Arm as install objective
  • C. They only affect logging
  • D. They replace schedulers

Answer: B

DOCA installation and validation is an explicit objective and can affect workload networking behavior.

Q5. What is a common anti-pattern in first-time deployment?
  • A. Using preflight checklists
  • B. Continuing installation after failed prerequisite gate
  • C. Recording versions
  • D. Capturing baseline logs

Answer: B

Proceeding after failed preflight introduces hard-to-debug downstream failures.

Q6. What is the best evidence of installation completion?
  • A. Service process started
  • B. End-to-end validated path from scheduler to successful GPU workload and endpoint health
  • C. Package list screenshot
  • D. Ticket closed

Answer: B

Completion should be proven by integrated functionality, not only service startup.

Q7. Why include rollback points in deployment runbook?
  • A. They are optional
  • B. They reduce downtime and risk when validation fails
  • C. They increase failure probability
  • D. They replace testing

Answer: B

Rollback planning is essential for safe maintenance and fast recovery.

Q8. In exam scenarios, what most improves installation troubleshooting quality?
  • A. Broad retries
  • B. Timestamped stage evidence and explicit pass/fail criteria
  • C. Guessing based on prior incidents
  • D. Ignoring dependency mapping

Answer: B

Structured evidence reduces ambiguity and supports deterministic troubleshooting decisions.

Primary References

Curated from official NVIDIA NCP-AIO blueprint/study guide sources and primary platform documentation.

Objectives

  1. 1.1 Describe deployment architecture and sequence.
  2. 1.2 Verify hardware and software requirements.
  3. 1.3 Configure and validate hardware firmware and software.
  4. 1.4 Implement NVIDIA Management and Monitoring stack (NVIDIA BCM, NVIDIA Mission Control and NVIDIA UFM).
  5. 1.5 Deploy NVIDIA BCM toolkit by using package management, virtual machines and/or docker container.
  6. 1.6 Install and configure NVIDIA Run:ai, Slurm and Kubernetes scheduler.
  7. 1.7 Provision users, projects and quotas.
  8. 1.8 Configure and validate NVIDIA NGC private registry and NGC API key.
  9. 1.9 Install, configure and validate NVIDIA NIM and TensorRT-LLM.
  10. 1.10 Configure and validate inference backend and endpoint.
  11. 1.11 Install and configure NVIDIA Magnum IO and workload.
  12. 1.12 Install and configure NVIDIA container toolkit on worker nodes.
  13. 1.13 Install and configure DOCA services on DPU Arm by using package manager and/or containers.

Navigation