Protected

NCP-AIO module content is available after admin verification. Redirecting...

If you are not redirected, login.

Access

Admin only

NCP-AIO module pages are restricted to admin users.

Training / NCP-AIO

Administration

Module study guide

Priority 4 of 4 ยท Domain 2 in exam order

Scope

Exam study content

This module contains expanded study notes, scenario playbooks, command runbooks, and exam-style checkpoint questions.

Exam weight
23%
Priority tier
Tier 2
Why this domain
Day-2 governance domain for stable user, scheduler, and artifact management.

Exam Framework

How to reason under pressure

1. Stabilize Before Optimizing

  • Verify hardware and management-plane integrity first.
  • Confirm firmware/software baseline consistency.
  • Only then run performance tuning decisions.

2. Single-Variable Changes

  • Change one parameter at a time when investigating regressions.
  • Use before/after evidence with constant workload input.
  • Discard changes without reproducible benefit.

Exam Scope Coverage

What this module now covers

Domain 2 covers day-2 administration across OS maintenance, scheduler operations, user and quota governance, and model/data lifecycle controls.

Track 1: OS and node lifecycle management

Stable operations depend on disciplined patching, drift control, and host baseline integrity.

  • Define maintenance windows and change validation criteria.
  • Track version drift across control and worker nodes.
  • Verify post-maintenance node and runtime health.

Drill: Create an OS maintenance checklist with pre/post validation commands.

Track 2: Scheduler administration

Workload reliability depends on correct scheduler health, policies, and queue behavior.

  • Administer Kubernetes and scheduler state with evidence-based checks.
  • Validate policy changes through controlled test workloads.
  • Keep scheduler health dashboards aligned to SLOs.

Drill: Run a scheduler health audit and identify one latent risk before incident occurs.

Track 3: User, role, and quota governance

Misconfigured RBAC/quotas can cause both security and capacity incidents.

  • Map users and roles to least-privilege policy.
  • Set and validate resource quotas per project/tenant.
  • Audit governance changes with traceability.

Drill: Design a quota and role matrix for two teams with different priority levels.

Track 4: Data/model management

Operational quality requires repeatable handling of model artifacts and dataset versions.

  • Track model and dataset versions used by production workloads.
  • Validate artifact integrity and access policies.
  • Align lifecycle procedures with rollback/recovery needs.

Drill: Build a model promotion checklist including version, access, and rollback fields.

Track 5: NGC private registry administration

Registry configuration and credentials are central dependencies for controlled deployments.

  • Validate API key and registry connectivity from target environments.
  • Enforce access policy boundaries for teams and projects.
  • Audit registry usage for dependency and compliance visibility.

Drill: Simulate API key rotation and verify zero-downtime artifact access.

Module Resources

Downloads and quick links

Concept Explanations

Deep-dive concept library

Exam Decision Hierarchy

Prioritize decisions in this order: safety and hardware integrity, baseline consistency, controlled validation, then optimization.

  • If integrity checks fail, stop optimization and remediate first.
  • Compare against known-good baseline before changing multiple variables.
  • Document rationale for each decision to support incident replay.

Operational Evidence Standard

Treat every key action as evidence-producing: command, output, timestamp, and expected vs observed behavior.

  • Evidence should be reproducible by another engineer.
  • Use stable command templates for repeated environments.
  • Keep concise but complete validation artifacts for exam-style reasoning.

Administration as control plane hygiene

Admin operations maintain platform hygiene so workloads run predictably and securely.

  • Treat drift detection as continuous work.
  • Codify recurring tasks into runbooks.
  • Measure admin effectiveness with incident reduction metrics.

Governance and capacity are coupled

Role and quota policy decisions influence both security posture and workload fairness.

  • Quota policy should align with priority and business impact.
  • RBAC changes should be tested before full rollout.
  • Audit trails are mandatory for high-stakes environments.

Artifact lifecycle as operational dependency

Model and dataset lifecycle management is core operations work, not a one-time release task.

  • Track provenance for every promoted artifact.
  • Validate access policy and integrity at each stage.
  • Pre-plan rollback path before promotion.

Scenario Playbooks

Exam-style scenario explanations

Scenario: Quota policy change causes high-priority job starvation

A new quota policy was deployed and high-priority jobs are now queued while low-priority workloads consume resources.

Architecture Diagram

Users/Teams
   |
RBAC + Quotas
   |
Scheduler
   |
GPU Worker Pool

Response Flow

  1. Inspect recent quota and role changes with audit context.
  2. Compare queue behavior against intended priority policy.
  3. Apply corrected quota policy and rerun representative workload.
  4. Document prevention checks for future policy changes.

Success Signals

  • High-priority jobs schedule within target window.
  • No unintended privilege or capacity leak appears.
  • Policy change is fully auditable.

Kubernetes quota check

kubectl get resourcequota -A

Expected output (example)

Quota values match intended project capacity policy.

Slurm association view

sacctmgr show assoc

Expected output (example)

Associations reflect expected account and limit settings.

Scenario: Registry credential update breaks model pulls

After API key rotation, some workloads cannot pull model artifacts from NGC private registry.

Architecture Diagram

NGC API Key
    |
Registry Access Policy
    |
Runtime Artifact Pull

Response Flow

  1. Validate active registry config context on affected nodes.
  2. Compare credential distribution and scope against policy.
  3. Repair credential path with minimal blast radius.
  4. Run pull validation from all affected execution zones.

Success Signals

  • Artifact pulls succeed consistently after remediation.
  • Credential scope aligns with least-privilege policy.
  • Rotation runbook updated with missing checks.

CLI and Commands

High-yield command runbooks

CLI Execution Pattern

  • 1. Capture baseline state before running any intrusive command.
  • 2. Execute command with explicit scope (node, interface, GPU set).
  • 3. Compare output against expected baseline signature.
  • 4. Record timestamp and decision (pass, investigate, remediate).

Administration baseline runbook

Capture core admin state before and after maintenance or policy changes.

Node health overview

kubectl get nodes -o wide

Expected output (example)

Nodes report Ready and expected software/runtime profile.

Scheduler queue overview

squeue

Expected output (example)

Queue status reflects expected workload distribution and priorities.

BCM version/status

cmsh -c 'show version'

Expected output (example)

BCM reports expected installed version and CLI access.
  • Capture before and after any admin maintenance event.
  • Store outputs with change-ticket identifiers.

Governance and registry verification runbook

Validate RBAC/quota governance and registry access posture.

Role binding inventory

kubectl get rolebinding,clusterrolebinding -A

Expected output (example)

Bindings align with approved least-privilege model.

Quota inventory

kubectl get resourcequota -A

Expected output (example)

Resource quotas reflect approved project allocations.

NGC auth context

ngc config current

Expected output (example)

NGC config reports expected org/team and key context.
  • Pair access checks with policy approval records.
  • Revalidate immediately after key rotation events.

Common Problems

Failure patterns and fixes

Silent drift in scheduler configuration

Symptoms

  • Jobs route unexpectedly or wait longer than baseline.
  • Policy behavior differs between clusters.

Likely Cause

Untracked configuration drift in scheduler or admission policies.

Remediation

  • Compare live scheduler config with approved baseline.
  • Reapply known-good configuration set.
  • Add drift-detection check to admin cadence.

Prevention: Automate config drift reporting and enforce review gates for policy changes.

Quota misalignment causes team friction and missed SLAs

Symptoms

  • Priority jobs blocked by quota ceilings.
  • Low-priority jobs consume disproportionate resources.

Likely Cause

Quota design not aligned to workload priority and business criticality.

Remediation

  • Review actual usage and priority patterns.
  • Adjust quota policies and add exception workflow.
  • Validate with representative mixed-priority workload.

Prevention: Review quota policies periodically against observed workload distribution.

Registry access failures after credential changes

Symptoms

  • Artifact pull failures appear across selected nodes.
  • Model deploy jobs fail during startup.

Likely Cause

Credential rollout incomplete or key scope misconfigured.

Remediation

  • Audit key distribution path and scope settings.
  • Update credentials on affected nodes and retest pulls.
  • Capture key rotation post-check evidence.

Prevention: Use staged key rotation with node-level validation checklist.

Lab Walkthroughs

Step-by-step execution guides

Walkthrough: Scheduler and governance health audit

Verify scheduler state, role bindings, and quotas in one repeatable admin pass.

Prerequisites

  • Admin access to cluster and scheduler tooling.
  • Approved governance policy baseline.
  • Sample workloads for validation checks.
  1. Collect cluster and queue baseline.

    kubectl get nodes -o wide && squeue

    Expected: Cluster and queue state are visible and stable.

  2. Review role bindings and quota settings.

    kubectl get rolebinding,clusterrolebinding,resourcequota -A

    Expected: Bindings and quotas match approved governance model.

  3. Run representative workload and validate policy behavior.

    kubectl apply -f priority-workload.yaml && kubectl get pods -A

    Expected: Workload scheduling follows expected priority and quota constraints.

Success Criteria

  • Scheduler and governance controls are consistent and auditable.
  • No unexpected privilege or resource bypass is observed.
  • Audit output is archived with timestamps.

Walkthrough: NGC registry administration check

Validate API key context and registry pull behavior from admin-runbook perspective.

Prerequisites

  • NGC CLI installed.
  • Current and rotated API keys available.
  • Target nodes with registry access path.
  1. Display current NGC configuration.

    ngc config current

    Expected: Expected organization/team and key context are active.

  2. Test artifact pull path.

    ngc registry model list nvidia

    Expected: Registry query succeeds without auth error.

  3. Rotate key and retest.

    ngc config set && ngc registry model list nvidia

    Expected: Post-rotation pull path remains functional.

Success Criteria

  • Registry admin workflow is repeatable and resilient.
  • Credential rotation does not break artifact access.
  • Evidence supports compliance and incident review.

Study Sprint

10-day execution plan

Day Focus Output
1 Map administration objectives into day-2 operations checklist. Domain 2 operations matrix.
2 OS lifecycle and drift-control review. Node baseline and patching plan.
3 Scheduler health and policy audit. Scheduler admin report.
4 User, role, and quota governance workflow. Governance policy runbook.
5 Data/model lifecycle administration controls. Artifact management checklist.
6 NGC registry administration and key management. Registry administration validation sheet.
7 Cross-domain admin incident simulation. Incident response notes.
8 Audit trail and compliance evidence capture. Admin evidence pack template.
9 Timed administration scenario drill. Exam response quick patterns.
10 Final revision and command recap. Domain 2 quick admin sheet.

Hands-on Labs

Practical module work

Each lab includes a collapsed execution sample with representative CLI usage and expected output.

Lab A: Scheduler admin health audit

Perform end-to-end scheduler administration checks and capture drift findings.

  • Validate control-plane and node health.
  • Review queue or scheduling policy health indicators.
  • Document one preventive action for detected risk.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Administration baseline runbook)

kubectl get nodes -o wide

Expected output (example)

Nodes report Ready and expected software/runtime profile.

Lab B: RBAC and quota governance drill

Apply role and quota policy changes and verify enforcement behavior.

  • Create/modify role bindings and resource quotas.
  • Run allowed/denied operation tests.
  • Capture audit output and approvals.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Administration baseline runbook)

squeue

Expected output (example)

Queue status reflects expected workload distribution and priorities.

Lab C: Model/data admin lifecycle exercise

Validate artifact version control and rollback readiness.

  • Register new model version and metadata.
  • Run integrity and access validation.
  • Simulate rollback to previous approved version.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Administration baseline runbook)

cmsh -c 'show version'

Expected output (example)

BCM reports expected installed version and CLI access.

Lab D: NGC registry operations

Operate registry access securely with key rotation and validation.

  • Validate API key context before and after rotation.
  • Confirm artifact pull path from target nodes.
  • Verify no unauthorized access surfaces.
Execution Sample (Collapsed)
  1. Capture baseline state for the target node/group before changes.
  2. Run scoped validation command for this lab objective.
  3. Compare observed output against expected signature.

Sample Command (Governance and registry verification runbook)

kubectl get rolebinding,clusterrolebinding -A

Expected output (example)

Bindings align with approved least-privilege model.

Exam Pitfalls

Common failure patterns

  • Treating admin tasks as manual one-offs instead of repeatable runbooks.
  • Changing roles/quotas without verification tests.
  • Ignoring scheduler drift until workload failures occur.
  • Managing model/data artifacts without version provenance.
  • Rotating registry keys without dependency impact validation.
  • Operating without timestamped audit evidence for admin changes.

Practice Set

Domain checkpoint questions

Attempt each question first, then open the answer and explanation.

Q1. What is the most important property of day-2 admin operations?
  • A. Ad-hoc speed
  • B. Repeatable, auditable procedures with validation gates
  • C. Manual edits on production nodes
  • D. Avoiding logs

Answer: B

Operational reliability depends on repeatability and evidence-backed administration.

Q2. Why verify role and quota changes immediately after update?
  • A. To generate more tickets
  • B. To confirm intended permissions/capacity without side effects
  • C. To avoid governance
  • D. It is optional

Answer: B

Policy changes can create hidden access or capacity regressions unless validated.

Q3. What is a strong sign of scheduler admin maturity?
  • A. No monitoring
  • B. Continuous health checks and policy validation with documented outcomes
  • C. Reactive-only response
  • D. One-time setup

Answer: B

Mature administration includes proactive monitoring and repeat validation.

Q4. Why is model/data version tracking part of administration domain?
  • A. Versions do not affect operations
  • B. Version provenance enables reliable promotion, rollback, and incident analysis
  • C. It is only for development teams
  • D. It replaces RBAC

Answer: B

Without provenance, troubleshooting and rollback decisions become risky and ambiguous.

Q5. What is the safest NGC key rotation approach?
  • A. Rotate in production without checks
  • B. Rotate with staged validation and dependency verification
  • C. Never rotate keys
  • D. Share one key across all teams

Answer: B

Staged rotation avoids deployment outages and supports secure operations.

Q6. Which artifact best supports admin incident forensics?
  • A. Memory of previous changes
  • B. Timestamped change log with command output and approval context
  • C. Unlabeled script
  • D. Empty ticket

Answer: B

Forensics requires precise timeline and reproducible evidence.

Q7. What is a common anti-pattern in quota management?
  • A. Testing quota enforcement
  • B. Setting quotas without observing workload impact or exception flow
  • C. Reviewing usage trends
  • D. Aligning quota with business priority

Answer: B

Quota policy must be validated against real workload behavior and escalation needs.

Q8. Which outcome best shows Domain 2 readiness?
  • A. Admin CLI access exists
  • B. OS/scheduler/governance/artifact controls are validated and auditable
  • C. One successful deployment
  • D. No users onboarded

Answer: B

Readiness means controls are operationally effective, not just configured.

Primary References

Curated from official NVIDIA NCP-AIO blueprint/study guide sources plus primary scheduler and registry docs.

Objectives

  1. 2.1 Perform OS management and maintenance.
  2. 2.2 Perform Kubernetes and workload scheduler management.
  3. 2.3 Perform user management, role assignment and quota management.
  4. 2.4 Perform and verify data and model management.
  5. 2.5 Perform and verify NVIDIA NGC private registry and NGC API key.

Navigation